Were we talking about peer review earlier?
March 15, 2012
Yes, we were. Here’s a fun illustrated look at it (“Peer Fortress: The Scientific Battlefield”). For example,
The Demoman
Right from the title, the Demoman knew your paper had to be rejected.
If the review must exceed the length of your manuscript to accomplish this, so be it. Your paper is too simply dangerous to publish.
It must, and will, be stopped.
More a treatise on your incompetence than a traditional peer review, this tome leaves no nit unpicked.
Papers that receive the Demoman’s gentle touch must be identified through dental records.
Follow UD News at Twitter!
Copyright © 2012 Uncommon Descent. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement UNLESS EXPLICIT PERMISSION OTHERWISE HAS BEEN GIVEN. Please contact legal@uncommondescent.com so we can take legal action immediately.
Plugin by Taragana
Powered by WP Robot